| About |
| Contact |
| Jobs @ MINC Risk |
| - - - - - - - |
| Emergency Numbers |
| Hazardous Substances |
| Health & Safety Topics |
| OHS & Fire links |
| OHS World & Local News |
| - - - - - - - |
| MINC Services |
Safety Alert
| Forklift operation– (QLD May 2010). The purpose of the safety alert is to remind employers and forklift operators of the need to operate forklifts in a safe manner. A recent fatality in Queensland has highlighted the need for employers and operators to ensure forklifts operations and processes meet best practice |
| Go-kart– (NSW April 2010). A fatal accident at a New South Wales go-kart track has prompted a safety alert, recommending people do not go for a ride if their hair or clothing is not properly secured. The 26-year-old Sydney woman died earlier this month when her Islamic head dress got entangled in the rear axle of the go-kart at a Port Stephens track. |
| Foil ceiling insulation– (NT March 2010). Electrical workers & contractors, tradespersons and householders must be aware of the electrical safety risks associated with ceiling spaces where foil insulation has been laid. |
OH&S
H.A.S.I.D.
Specify Controls | Specifing Controls Measures |
|
|
|
|
With Steps 1 & 2 concluded, step 3 starts the process of Controlling the Hazard, with an aim of eliminating where possible the risk. In many instances Elimination will not be possible and therefore reduction of the Risk to it’s most controlled state becomes the objective.
Step 3. 1. Before designing any new Control measures MINC Risk Services shall spend time with the client and their staff to ensure that sufficient measures do not already exist and are just not being applied correctly. Depending on the number of hazards and severity of the risk this process may take some time. 2. On conclusion of the above activity, MINC Risk Services shall prepare a report which details all existing control measures and the reason for the failure. Together with the client the MINC auditor shall discuss the best approach for rectifying this inadequacy. 3. For all remaining hazards, it is now time to work on introducing the correct Control Measures to eliminate the hazard or reduce the risk it poses. For this we apply a seven step Control Hierarchy process. These measures are listed in order of priority for adoption and are as follows:
a). Preferred Option - Design and EliminationThe ideal solution is to get rid of a hazard completely. This is the most effective control and should always be attempted in the first instance. This may mean discontinuing dangerous work practices or removing dangerous substances or equipment. For example, using a machine to do a repetitive manual activity or completely removing asbestos from a workplace. b). Substitute, Redesign & SeparationIf a hazard cannot be eliminated, there are a number of control options that can be used alone, or in combination, to prevent or minimise exposure to the risk. Substitution involves replacing the hazard with one that presents a lower (and more manageable) risk. For example, a hazardous work practice or substance is replaced with a less hazardous one. Examples of substitution include:
Redesign involves changing the design of the workplace, equipment or work process. It involves thinking about ways the work could be done differently to make the workplace safer, such as rearranging aspects of the workplace, modifying equipment, combining tasks, changing procedures to eliminate hazardous steps, changing the sequence of tasks in a job and/or reducing the frequency of performing a dangerous task. Examples of redesign include:
Separate refers to isolating or separating the hazard from the person, or the person from the hazard. Examples of isolation include:
c). Administration and PPEAdministration and the use of personal protective equipment are lowest on the list of control priorities. These controls are not relied on as the primary means of risk control until the options higher in the list of control hierarchy have been exhausted. These controls require management enforcement and commitment, together with behaviour modification. They are dependent on appropriate human behaviour to work properly and, therefore, tend to be less effective. In general, administration and personal protective equipment should only be used:
Administrative controls involve minimising exposure to a risk through the use of procedures or instruction. It is often necessary to use these controls in conjunction with other measures. For example, if a mechanical device is introduced to reduce manual handling, the operators will also need to be trained how to use it. Examples of administrative controls include:
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) is worn by people as a final barrier between themselves and the hazard. This measure does not control the hazard at the source and relies on behaviour modification for its success. The success of this control is dependent on the protective equipment being:
Personal protective equipment is often an expensive option in the long term when the costs of maintenance, supervision and (potentially more) injuries are taken into account. Examples of personal protective equipment include:
4. After the Control Hierarchy is decided MINC Risk Services shall re-assess all risks based on the new methods of control to confirm that the Rating now achieved is acceptable. On completion of this assessment a final discussion shall be concluded with the client to ensure they are still agreeable to the measures. 5. The final stage is our quality control point – or “HOLD POINT”. This identifies the need for the actions to be reviewed and closed out before moving onto the next Step. The list and combination are extensive. With each combined service receive a minimum 10% discount off the total services fee. MINC Risk Services look forward to helping answer your questions and developing your business to the new highs in the area of Health & Safety. 1300 88 MINC (1300 88 6462)
Contact Us |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|




