.

Safety Alert

Forklift operation– (QLD May 2010). The purpose of the safety alert is to remind employers and forklift operators of the need to operate forklifts in a safe manner. A recent fatality in Queensland has highlighted the need for employers and operators to ensure forklifts operations and processes meet best practice
 
Go-kart– (NSW April 2010). A fatal accident at a New South Wales go-kart track has prompted a safety alert, recommending people do not go for a ride if their hair or clothing is not properly secured. The 26-year-old Sydney woman died earlier this month when her Islamic head dress got entangled in the rear axle of the go-kart at a Port Stephens track.
 
Foil ceiling insulation– (NT March 2010). Electrical workers & contractors, tradespersons and householders must be aware of the electrical safety risks associated with ceiling spaces where foil insulation has been laid.
 
Home arrow OH&S arrow H.A.S.I.D. arrow Assess Risk
Assess Risk PDF Print E-mail
Understanding the risk behind procrastination is what helps many individuals become successful...

Again, similar to step 1, this step contains three activities and is a critical area of the whole process

Having completed the Hazard Identification, MINC Risk Services is able to associate the type and level of Risk against each Hazard. Once the Risk Rating and Prioritising are complete, the client will have a very clear picture of which hazard needs attention first.

Step 2

1. Outlining the Risk requires MINC Risk Services staff to look at the application to the hazard and identify specific risks associated with that application. Refer to the examples below from a SWMS prepared for a project. Once determined we are then ready to apply this knowledge to the next activities – Risk Rating and Prioritising. Note that we look not only at the physical risk but also the financial.

  • Electric shock or death through electrocution if coming near or in contact with overhead lines
  • Drowning, falls, slips, trips, electrocution
  • Financial cost to due cutting of fibre optic cables and disruption to local businesses
  • Financial cost to due breaking of water or sewerage pipes and disruption to local businesses
  • Contact with moving machinery
  • Accidental injury from contact with hand tools
  • Trips, slips and falls

2. Whilst there are threee activities involved in this step, the process for establishing the Risk Rating and Priority requires a brief introduction

Risk Score Chart

The level of risk, or ‘risk rating’, is determined by the relationship between Likelihood and Consequence. This relationship can be represented using a matrix, as follows.

LIKELIHOOD
CONSEQUENCES
Disaster
Very Serious
Serious
Substantial
Minor
Almost Certain
Very High
Very High
High
High
High
Likely
Very High
Very High
High
Moderate
Moderate
Possible
Very High
High
High
Moderate
Low
Remote
High
Moderate
Moderate
Low
Low
Practically Impossible
Moderate
Low
Low
Low
Low

Determine the risk score for each risk by plotting consequence and likelihood estimates on the table above.

This stage of the risk assessment gives a basis for ranking risks in terms of their priorities. It is important to note that the risk scores obtained have no absolute value. This chart provides a means of ranking the risks ONLY.

The ratings (Very High to Low) in the risk priority chart indicate how important it is to do something about each risk, as follows:

Rating
Action
Very High
The risk may need immediate isolation to prevent injury
High
Take some action to reduce these risks immediately
Moderate
Do something about these risks as soon as possible
Low
These risks may not need immediate attention

Where there are a large number of hazards identified which offer a number of similar level risks, it may be necessary to apply further determinants to the equation to assist with the prioritisation and therefore order of actions. In this instance it is possible for MINC Risk Services to adopt as more mathematical basis to the assessment process. This process incorporates a tool commonly referred to as a Risk Score Calculator.

This method ties in three considerations to calculate the Risk Score:

  • Probability
  • Exposure
  • Consequences

Under each of these considerations are a similar grouping of subsections as the chart below demonstrates

Remember, the risk scores are useful for comparison purposes only. When risk scores for all risks in the workplace are compared, the resulting ranking will be a guide to the order in which the risks should be addressed. The final decision must be determined at consultation between the client and MINC Risk Services auditor

The list and combination are extensive. With each combined service receive a minimum 10% discount off the total services fee.

MINC Risk Services look forward to helping answer your questions and developing your business to the new highs in the area of Health & Safety.

1300 88 MINC (1300 88 6462)
Contact Us

 
< Prev   Next >